The qpopper list archive ending on 18 Dec 1999
Topics covered in this issue include:
1. Re: qpopper faq conributions
"Miss Parker" <miss.parker at dialcom.com dot pl>
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 12:20:03 +0100
2. Re: Quick tip for v3 users
"Christopher L. Davis" <cld at prin dot edu>
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 10:01:01 -0600
3. Re: qpopper faq conributions
Randall Gellens <randy at pensive dot org>
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:33:53 -0800
4. POP_DROP question
Mark Wendt <mwendt at intertv dot com>
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:13:35 -0500
5.
"Steve Pennington" <admin at networld dot com>
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:40:14 -0700
6. Permission problems.
"Steve Pennington" <admin at networld dot com>
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:49:18 -0700
7. Re: qpopper faq conributions
Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:51:43 +1300 (NZDT)
8. faq contributions: second attempt...
hypnose at t-online dot de (guenter wessling)
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:14:20 +0100
9. qpopper logging, second try
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Rieger=2CGötz=22?= <G.Rieger at uniorg dot de>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:15:26 +0100
10. Re: qpopper logging, second try
hypnose at t-online dot de (guenter wessling)
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:17:13 +0100
11. qpopper connection refused.
Tony Kim <tonyk at canadashop dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:59:24 -0700
12. Re: qpopper connection refused.
"Jack Barnett" <jbarnett at axil.netmate dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:19:11 -0600
13. Re: qpopper connection refused.
mark at islandnet dot com (Mark Morley)
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:29:42 -0800 (PST)
14. RE: qpopper connection refused.
Steven Fletcher <stevenf at shellnet.co dot uk>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:30:12 -0000
15. Re: qpopper logging, second try
Randall Gellens <randy at pensive dot org>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:07:59 -0800
16. Re: qpopper connection refused.
Vince Vielhaber <vev at michvhf dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:34:21 -0800
17. duplicate sending of emails
Karyn McCambridge <karynm at afb dot net>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:56:31 -0500
18. qpopper and NIS+
Khalid El-Allam --- SAIC <dw2celak at toaster.dii.osfl.disa dot mil>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:40:30 -0500
19. Re: duplicate sending of emails
Leonard Hermens <Leonard.Hermens at rcity dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:55:20 -0800
20. Unable to process From lines
Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 16:07:56 -0500
21. CAPA Error
Brent <bierblb at netins dot net>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:25:10 -0600
22. Re: Unable to process From lines
Qpopper Support <qpopper at qualcomm dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:04:09 -0800
23. PAM support for 3.0b25?
Jonathan Benson <sysadmin at ocean.com dot au>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:22:59 +1100
24. Re: PAM support for 3.0b25?
German Poo Caaman~o <gpoo at ubiobio dot cl>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:22:06 -0300
25. Error...
"Frederic boucher" <dziablo at hotmail dot com>
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:25:06 PST
26. -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change
Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:10:36 -0500
27. Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes),
Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:26:19 -0500
28. Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change
Ralph SOBEK <sobek at irit dot fr>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 19:31:18 +0100 (MET)
29. Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes.
"M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne at gamewood dot net>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:11:06 -0500
30. Received: by (for mbox:jay)
"Network Admin [JPeterson]" <jay at qtm dot net>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:57:51 -0500
31. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Leonard Hermens <Leonard.Hermens at rcity dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:11:52 -0800
32. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
James Sneeringer <jvs at ocslink dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:18:04 -0600 (CST)
33. Request regarding procmail/formail
"Nick Sancho" <nick at sonicair dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:58:57 -0700
34. Re: Request regarding procmail/formail
"M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne at gamewood dot net>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 16:15:18 -0500
35. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:20:24 +1300 (NZDT)
36. recipient rejected
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marcus_Vinícius_Eiras_Zamignani?= <marcus at triarquia.com dot br>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:41:20 -0200
37. Re: Request regarding procmail/formail
Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:21:56 +1300 (NZDT)
38. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Nick Christenson <npc at sendmail dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:44:21 -0800 (PST)
39. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:13:49 +1300 (NZDT)
40. Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change
Qpopper Support <qpopper at qualcomm dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:13:30 -0800
41. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
"Dan Harkless" <dan-qpopper at dilvish.speed dot net>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:07:08 -0800
42. Re: recipient rejected
"Jeremy C. Reed" <reed at wcug.wwu dot edu>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:21:57 -0800 (PST)
43. Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm dot com>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:22:37 -0800
44. RE: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
"Network Admin [JPeterson]" <jay at qtm dot net>
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:05:10 -0500
45. new user - dele command
Shane Clayworth <sclay at turboweb.net dot au>
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:48:05 +1100
46. Re: new user - dele command
Randall Gellens <randy at pensive dot org>
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:10:30 -0800
47. Qpopper 3.0b26 available
Qpopper Support <qpopper at qualcomm dot com>
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:46:22 -0800
48. Re: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
"Kenneth Porter" <shiva at well dot com>
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 20:57:06 -0800
49. Re: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
Tomasz Orzechowski <tmo at apk dot net>
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 01:55:56 -0500
50. Re: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
Carrer Yuri <yurj at dns.alfa dot it>
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:20:44 +0100 (MET)
From: "Miss Parker" <miss.parker at dialcom.com dot pl>
Subject: Re: qpopper faq conributions
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 12:20:03 +0100
> To get around this shooting problem, you can create a BULLDB - database
> instead of having .popbull - files in every user¥s home directory.
> This BULLDB database is initiated by a change in the Makefile. With
qpopper
> 2.5.3, just follow the instructions in INSTALL. Add -DBULLDIR.... to the
> "defs" line.
> With qpopper 30b25, it seems a little more complicated, since there are
> more than one Makefiles (Makefile; /popper/Makefile; /common/Makefile...).
> It is suggested to change "config.h" BEFORE doing ./configure instead of
> changing Makefiles AFTER ./configure.
> (((Here should be the modification of config.h; however - I do not know
how
> and what to change.. :( this is for you all, then...)))
yeah that's the problem that troubles me lately...
how to enable BULLDB database in qpopper 30b25?
thanks
-----------
Miss Parker
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 10:01:01 -0600
From: "Christopher L. Davis" <cld at prin dot edu>
Subject: Re: Quick tip for v3 users
At 12:44 PM 12/10/99 +0000, Fergal Daly wrote:
>Maybe you all knew this, but in case you didn't. qpopper 3 is set to
>compile with debugging info built in (I'm talking about the -g switch on
>gcc) and this makes the executable about 4 times larger than it needs to be
>on my linux machine. I ran
>
>strip popper
>
>to remove the debug symbols, I got an executable that was 100k instead of
>400k. I honestly don't know if this will improve performance any, but it
>doesn't hurt.
Hmm. I tried this on a 900K solaris 7 executable and it dropped down to
90K! Thanks for the tip.
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher L. Davis Systems and Network Administrator
The Principia PHONE: (314)-434-2100
13201 Clayton Road FAX: (314)-275-3538
St. Louis, MO 63131 INTERNET: cld at prin dot edu
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:33:53 -0800
From: Randall Gellens <randy at pensive dot org>
Subject: Re: qpopper faq conributions
At 1:45 AM +0100 12/14/99, guenter wessling wrote:
> With qpopper 30b25, it seems a little more complicated, since there are
> more than one Makefiles (Makefile; /popper/Makefile; /common/Makefile...).
> It is suggested to change "config.h" BEFORE doing ./configure instead of
> changing Makefiles AFTER ./configure.
If you are going to edit config.h, do so *after* running ./configure,
since ./configure creates config.h.
You could add '#define BULLDB 1' in config.h, for example.
This should be a ./configure flag.
--
Randall Gellens Randy at Pensive dot Org
---------------------- (randomly-selected tag) ---------------------
Any idiot can face a crisis, it's this day to day living that wears
you out. --Anton Chekov
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:13:35 -0500
From: Mark Wendt <mwendt at intertv dot com>
Subject: POP_DROP question
Hi,
I've scoured the archives on this, and can find a couple of questions
similar, but no answers. We use Solaris 7 as our server software, and
Qpopper 2.53 as our current pop server. I've compiled the code using
/extra_disk/spool/poptemp as the POP_DROP directory. We use /var/mail as
the mail directory. Watching popper in operation, popper is still using
/var/mail as the POP_DROP directory instead of the
/extra_disk/spool/poptemp. Is there another line in config.h I need to
change to make this work?
Mark Wendt
From: "Steve Pennington" <admin at networld dot com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:40:14 -0700
From: "Steve Pennington" <admin at networld dot com>
Subject: Permission problems.
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:49:18 -0700
Enforcing stricter permissions on "/var/spool/mail/username"
I keep getting this error. I've looked through the docs and mailling lists
but can't find an answer.
I've tried doing a chmod 600 * on my mail spool directory and it works fine
for awhile then I start getting these errors again.
Also I am trying to get the permissions on my mail directory set right in
general. When I set the permissions according to sendmails faq chmod go-w
/spooldirectory and all other directories below that. Sendmail works fine
but qpopper gives me an error about not being able to create the .pop file.
I've tried to setuid to root for popper excecutable but it doesn't help.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Steve
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:51:43 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Subject: Re: qpopper faq conributions
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Randall Gellens wrote:
> If you are going to edit config.h, do so *after* running ./configure,
> since ./configure creates config.h.
or edit config.h.in
AB
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 00:14:20 +0100
From: hypnose at t-online dot de (guenter wessling)
Subject: faq contributions: second attempt...
Hi.
Let´s give it another try.
Q: How do I configure qpopper on my Linux-system (I386, 2.0.36) with a
bulletin database (BULLDB) instead of the ".popbull"-files in the users´
home directories ?
With qpopper 2.5.3, the BULLDB database is initiated by a change in the
Makefile. Just follow the instructions in INSTALL. (Add -DBULLDIR.... to
the "defs" line....)
With qpopper 30(b25), it seems a little more complicated, since there are
more than one Makefiles (Makefile; /popper/Makefile; /common/Makefile...).
It is suggested to change "config.h" instead of changing Makefiles (we are
now *after* the "./configure" - since ./configure creates config.h and the
Makefiles).
You could add '#define BULLDB 1' in config.h, for example.
So:
create /var/spool/bulldirname (/var/spool/bulls, f.e.)
enter /var/spool/bulls
touch bulldb.pag
touch bulldb.dir
owner and group: root (? works fine in 2.5.3, but: necessary ?)
edit /popper/popper.h for an eventual change of '#define NEWBULLCNT 1'
(line 129; see INSTALL - changes in popper.h - for details of NEWBULLCNT).=
enter main directory of qpopper (the one with "configure")
do ./configure --enable-bulletins=/var/spool/bulls
You get config.h and in there, add
#define BULLDB 1
somewhere (? line - any special point ?).
Do *not* change any Makefile (for purpose of bulletins, at least).
do make .
This should produce the executable and, when popper runs,
/var/spool/bulls/bulldb is created. It will contain a list of the users and
the corresponding number of the user´s latest received bulletin.
If for some reasen bulletins get mixed up, just delete bulldb (when system
is in pause, of course). bulldb will be re-created when any user receives
mail.
You may want to inform the users that bulletins have been reorganized, and
all is fine.
Would this be appropriate ? Could the ?...? be replaced, maybe ? Anything
else to add ?
Thanks for all your remarks. Special greetings to Miss Parker and Mr. G.
Guenter
:) have a nice day - alles Gute - :)
Guenter Wessling (hypnose at t-online dot de)
- Westfalian Society of Hypnosis -
- Westfaelische Gesellschaft fuer Hypnose -
48165 Muenster, Germany
fax: 0049 (0)2501 27273=09
http://home.t-online.de/home/hypnose
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Rieger=2CGötz=22?= <G.Rieger at uniorg dot de>
Subject: qpopper logging, second try
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:15:26 +0100
hello there,
i am running qpopper 2.53 on a suse linux box. everything works fine, except
that i cant change the logging behaviour.
until now, every pop-request is logged in /var/log/messages and
/var/log/mail. i would like to have the qpopper-logging only in
/var/log/poplog or so because we are running some software which is polling
the popd very often.
in the documentation it says that the default logging on bsd syslog goes to
local0. so i tried this in the syslog.conf, but nothing changed.
can anybody help me with that?
i would be very grateful, because i have already spent hours on that. ;-)
regards,
goetz
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:17:13 +0100
From: hypnose at t-online dot de (guenter wessling)
Subject: Re: qpopper logging, second try
At 08:15 15.12.99 +0100, you wrote:
>i am running qpopper 2.53 on a suse linux box. everything works fine,=
except
>that i cant change the logging behaviour.
>until now, every pop-request is logged in /var/log/messages and
>/var/log/mail. i would like to have the qpopper-logging only in
>/var/log/poplog or so because we are running some software which is polling
>the popd very often.
>goetz
>
Hi, Götz.
I´m having trouble with misunderstandigs again:
what exactly do you want ? No more logging at all ? Logging somewhere else ?
Let´s put it this way:
-----
Q: Can I stop qpopper from logging at all ? Or, at least, have less output
to /var/log/messages and /var/log/maillog ? (Suse Linux)
A: In 2.5.3, i think you *cannot*.
In 3.0, you can modify logging behaviour.
For 2.5.3: all there is in /var/log/messages on a I386 DLD 6.0, 2.0.36,
is something like 'stats tom.and.jerry 3 1287 0 44' for every connection.
With lots of users, there is lots of stats.
Add maybe an entry to your crontab for getting rid of /var/log/messages
daily, hourly...
maillog is more explicit - crontab should work here, too. Remember: maillog
contains sendmail output; to change this, you have to work on sendmail.cf.
For 3.0: if you do
./configure --enable-debugging
popper will change logging behaviour.
Put in inetd.conf the following starting command for popper:
pop3 stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/popper popper -d -s -t
/var/log/popper_log
and you will have no more entries in /var/log/messages.
Presuming, of course, popper runs in /usr/local. You can change popper_log
to whatever name suits you. The file will be created automatically.
Of course, crontab should have an entry for popper_log, too - grows fast.
If you don not put the '-d -t /var/log/popper_log'-flags to your
inetd-conf, there should be no logging output at all. (? haven´t testet ?)
Except, of course again, sendmail´s output to /var/log/maillog.
On purpose of security:
for someone trying to break in through pop (telnet pop-server 110), the
logging of this will be in /var/log/popper_log, too.
If you do a tail -f /var/log/popper_log, you will see the message
PID Trace and Debug destination is file "/var/log/popper_log".
So you will probably not see *any* tracing if you skip the '-d -t
/var/log/popper_log'-flags in inetd.conf !
-----
Private remark:
This should work for suse also; if you use yast, this may override your
settings.
For those specific configurations, I recommend not using yast therefore; at
least in version 6.1.
Actually, yast is the reason why I use a different distribution (DLD).
Guenter
:) have a nice day - alles Gute - :)
Guenter Wessling (hypnose at t-online dot de)
- Westfalian Society of Hypnosis -
- Westfaelische Gesellschaft fuer Hypnose -
48165 Muenster, Germany
fax: 0049 (0)2501 27273=09
http://home.t-online.de/home/hypnose
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:59:24 -0700
From: Tony Kim <tonyk at canadashop dot com>
Subject: qpopper connection refused.
Hi, I just want to know if there is a problem with someone constantly
checking their mail.
I kept clicking on "check mail" over and over, and now it says connection
refused... i thought it might be a filter, but its not because other users
cant check their mail either.
Thanks.
Tony Kim.
From: "Jack Barnett" <jbarnett at axil.netmate dot com>
Subject: Re: qpopper connection refused.
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:19:11 -0600
Do you have tcpd wrappers installed over it. It can deny access from one
computer, but allow another.
Run the command
`grep pop3 /etc/inetd.conf`
or if that does work try
`grep popper /etc/inetd.conf`
and look for something like 'tcpd' or '/usr/sbin/wrapper'.
Also check your "/etc/hosts.allow" and "/etc/hosts.deny" files and see if
the address of the computer that got the 'connection refused' error is in
either one of those files, or the IP block that this computer is on.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Kim <tonyk at canadashop dot com>
To: Subscribers of Qpopper <qpopper at lists.pensive dot org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 10:59 AM
Subject: qpopper connection refused.
> Hi, I just want to know if there is a problem with someone constantly
> checking their mail.
>
> I kept clicking on "check mail" over and over, and now it says connection
> refused... i thought it might be a filter, but its not because other users
> cant check their mail either.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tony Kim.
>
From: mark at islandnet dot com (Mark Morley)
Subject: Re: qpopper connection refused.
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:29:42 -0800 (PST)
>
> Hi, I just want to know if there is a problem with someone constantly
> checking their mail.
>
> I kept clicking on "check mail" over and over, and now it says connection
> refused... i thought it might be a filter, but its not because other users
> cant check their mail either.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tony Kim.
>
You are probably exceeding the maximum number of connections per minute
allowed by your inetd. If inetd sees too many connections per minute
then it shuts down the port for a little while.
Check your man pages - many versions of inetd allow you to override
the default (which is often a mere 40 connections per minute). This
is usually done by adding ".number" to the [no]wait field. For example:
pop-3 stream tcp nowait.500 mail /usr/sbin/tcpd qpopper -s -T 300
Mark
From: Steven Fletcher <stevenf at shellnet.co dot uk>
Subject: RE: qpopper connection refused.
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:30:12 -0000
Qpopper isn't responsible for the connection, inetd is.
I belive that some versions of inetd have the ability to detect repeated
connection attempts within a cerain timeframe - xidentd does it afaik.
But please correct me if I'm wrong here anybody.
Steven Fletcher
stevenf at shellnet.co dot uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Kim [mailto:tonyk at canadashop dot com]
> Sent: 15 December 1999 16:59
> To: Subscribers of Qpopper
> Subject: qpopper connection refused.
>
>
> Hi, I just want to know if there is a problem with someone constantly
> checking their mail.
>
> I kept clicking on "check mail" over and over, and now it
> says connection
> refused... i thought it might be a filter, but its not
> because other users
> cant check their mail either.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tony Kim.
>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:07:59 -0800
From: Randall Gellens <randy at pensive dot org>
Subject: Re: qpopper logging, second try
At 10:17 AM +0100 12/15/99, guenter wessling wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Thanks for the FAQ suggestions.
Just to clarify:
-d and -t turn on trace logging. Only one of them is needed. -d
sends trace/debug output to usual syslog, while -t sends it to the
file you specify. If you leave off both, you get normal logging. If
you add either, you also get trace/debug entries (and if you use -t
you also change log location to specified file).
-s turns on statistics. If you leave it off, you don't get 'stats'
entries. If you add it, you get a 'stats' record written to the log
whenever a session ends.
--
Randall Gellens Randy at Pensive dot Org
---------------------- (randomly-selected tag) ---------------------
One's need for loneliness is not satisfied if one sits at a table alone.
There must be empty chairs as well. --Karl Kraus
Subject: Re: qpopper connection refused.
From: Vince Vielhaber <vev at michvhf dot com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:34:21 -0800
Tony Kim <tonyk at canadashop dot com> said:
> Hi, I just want to know if there is a problem with someone constantly
> checking their mail.
>
> I kept clicking on "check mail" over and over, and now it says connection
> refused... i thought it might be a filter, but its not because other users
> cant check their mail either.
inetd will stop answering if it gets too many requests. It should start
answering again after a few minutes.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev at michvhf.com http://www.pop4 dot net
128K ISDN - $24.95/mo or less; 56K Dialup - $17.95/mo or less www.pop4.net
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:56:31 -0500
From: Karyn McCambridge <karynm at afb dot net>
Subject: duplicate sending of emails
Anyone have trouble with duplicate emails being sent? I have a user who has
sent out emails to a distribution list and each recipient receives two of
the same message 1 minute apart. I am using qpopper 2.5.3
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:40:30 -0500
From: Khalid El-Allam --- SAIC <dw2celak at toaster.dii.osfl.disa dot mil>
Subject: qpopper and NIS+
Hi every one:
we have been using the standard pop3 server on a sun machine in a NIS+
domain. Every thing was working fine until I removed the
nobody read permission from the passwd.org_dir table, this new change
has caused pop3 failure to authenticate when NIS+ users
attempt to read their e-mail. Some one suggested to use qpopper
instead. Indeed we switched to qpopper 2.5.3 ( I downloaded a compiled
version from the net ) and things just went back to normal with the n-r
still on the password table.
Since I am new to qpopper; could some one explain how qpopper
authenticates users in a NIS+ domain?
thanks
K..Eallam
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:55:20 -0800
From: Leonard Hermens <Leonard.Hermens at rcity dot com>
Subject: Re: duplicate sending of emails
At 12:56 PM -0500 12/15/99, Karyn McCambridge wrote:
>Anyone have trouble with duplicate emails being sent? I have a user who has
>sent out emails to a distribution list and each recipient receives two of
>the same message 1 minute apart. I am using qpopper 2.5.3
Most clients send via SMTP, not POP. Are you sure that the client is
sending via the POP protocol?
If it is SMTP, then this is not the list to query. But perhaps if you
tell us the client being used, we can help out.
-- Leonard
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 16:07:56 -0500
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
Subject: Unable to process From lines
What is this?
Dec 15 16:06:44 drama popper30drac[15068]: ggomes at gary-202.us dot com: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes.
What are "recognition modes"?
_F
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:25:10 -0600
From: Brent <bierblb at netins dot net>
Subject: CAPA Error
Is there a way to stop the CAPA error other then upgrading or stop
using the new version of eudora? =)
Thanks for your help in advance!
Brent
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 17:04:09 -0800
From: Qpopper Support <qpopper at qualcomm dot com>
Subject: Re: Unable to process From lines
At 04:07 PM 12/15/99 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>What is this?
>
>
>Dec 15 16:06:44 drama popper30drac[15068]: ggomes at gary-202.us dot com: -ERR
>Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes.
This indicates that the mailbox is corrupted; The first line, which should
contain a "From " or MMDF separator is not recognizable.
If you are using procmail as the delivery agent (check the "Mlocal"
line in
/etc/sendmail.cf), or if procmail is being used in addition to a delivery
agent, be sure to upgrade to the latest version. Reports have linked
procmail v3.10 with spool file corruption. You can get an updated
procmail
at www.procmail.org.
If you are not using SunOS/Solaris, upgrade to qpopper version 3.0b22 or
later, which has fixes for mail locking issues. Best to use the
latest 3.0 beta.
If you are not using procmail, are using SunOS/Solaris or qpopper3.0b22 or
later, and are still experiencing spool file corruption, please send
email to
qpopper at qualcomm dot com and report it.
To fix the immediate problem for this user, edit the mail spool file
and check
the first line. If it does not start with "From ", delete it and any
following
lines until you see a separator. If the line starts with "rom " or
"FFrom",
correct it to be "From ". Note that the separator line starts with
"From ",
not "From: ".
>What are "recognition modes"?
The ability to recognize separators in the spool file -- either the mbox
"From " or the MMDF format.
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:22:59 +1100
From: Jonathan Benson <sysadmin at ocean.com dot au>
Subject: PAM support for 3.0b25?
Hi All
Whilst German Poo Caaman~o's PAM patch for 3.0b18 still managed to apply
to b22 it won't apply to b25 without some new work. The problem is with
the configure files.
I was wondering if someone had made a new version of this patch that
will work or if it is going to be worked in to b26 or ....?
I like to keep up with the latest Beta but I'm not too great at handling
compiling programs under Linux and when things get to this stage I'm
afraid I'm generally better off asking for help then trying to figure
things out on my own.
Jon
--
Jonathan Benson
Systems Administrator
Ocean Internet
http://www.ocean.com.au/
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:22:06 -0300
From: German Poo Caaman~o <gpoo at ubiobio dot cl>
Subject: Re: PAM support for 3.0b25?
Jonathan Benson wrote:
> Hi All
> Whilst German Poo Caaman~o's PAM patch for 3.0b18 still managed to
> apply to b22 it won't apply to b25 without some new work.
> The problem is with the configure files.
>
> I was wondering if someone had made a new version of this patch that
> will work or if it is going to be worked in to b26 or ....?
I sent the patch file to qpopper development team at time of
b18. They answer me that their was thinked support PAM and
that could add the code.
Also, I tried to manage the rpm package at RedHat Contrib
Network, but I never received any response.
After some problems to compile on HPUX and Aix, I left 3bxx and
I use only 2.5x series right now. On linux I left POP3 and
I'm trying to use only IMAP.
Please accept my apologizes, but it was a lost of time for me.
--
German Poo Caaman~o
mailto:gpoo at ubiobio dot cl
http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/chilelindo.html
"La historia no se lee, se escribe"
From: "Frederic boucher" <dziablo at hotmail dot com>
Subject: Error...
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:25:06 PST
Hi... I would like to grant access only to the right user when it says :
>>"I get the message "-ERR system error, can't open temporary file. >>Do you
>>own it?"
>>
>>This occurs when the user does not have the permissions to create >>the
>>temporary drop in the mail spool directory. Check the >>permissions of the
>>spool directory. Qpopper creates the temporary >>file .user.pop in the
>>mail spool directory. "
>>
Is the user mentionned in this faq the user who's trying to read his mail?
Because it doen't work for me but when I grant to "o" others, it do work.
I've checked in the /etc/inetd.conf file and the service is supposed to run
under user root... wich should not be a problem too... Any explanations?
thanks
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:10:36 -0500
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
Subject: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change
It would be somewhat useful if there were some debugging output that might point or hint to where it hits this problem in the mail file. I have a user now with 600+ messages, and I'm NOT about to go through each one of them to figure it out.
_F
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:26:19 -0500
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
Subject: Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes),
Actually... the solution in this case was to remove a stuck .user.pop file.
I've seen this before with qpopper in previous revisions. Where qpopper copies over an intact, good mail spool file, and ends up corrupting it. The line usually looks like
UIDL dki)_(*KINMODUXj98 sdosd84
Or whatever.
So, I think there is a yet to be identified bug in qpopper, that exists up to the current qpopper-3.0b25, which we're running.
_F
At 10:15 AM 12/16/99 -0800, Jeff Halper wrote:
>It's ALWAYS the first line - usually deleting the first message is all it takes
>
>Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > It would be somewhat useful if there were some debugging output that might point or hint to where it hits this problem in the mail file. I have a user now with 600+ messages, and I'm NOT about to go through each one of them to figure it out.
> >
> > _F
From: Ralph SOBEK <sobek at irit dot fr>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 19:31:18 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change
>>>>> "FA" == Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com> writes:
FA> It would be somewhat useful if there were some debugging output
FA> that might point or hint to where it hits this problem in the mail
FA> file. I have a user now with 600+ messages, and I'm NOT about to
FA> go through each one of them to figure it out.
I just signed up to this list, especially for a problem related to the
above message. We are using qpopper 2.5 running on our mail server
under Solaris 7.
Some user's, actually very few, are getting the above message. They
read there e-mail via Netscape from Silicon Graphics machines or PCs.
The reason that causes the above message is because spurious:
X-UIDL: 945349438.000
X-UIDL: 945349438.000
X-UIDL: 945349438.001
X-UIDL: 945349438.001
grouped together like this, but *not* with a message header, but
between messages. Once the mail spool is editted, then the above
message goes away! [ The above 4 X-UIDL lines are taken from an
actual user's mail file.]
But 3 minutes later when netscape makes another connection, the same
thing happens again. This has begun 1 week ago. Nothing was changed
in our installation of mail or the qpopper. Many people here read
their mail with via Pop-3, but less tha 10 people have this problem,
and they *all* are using different versions of Netscape Communicator
from 4.5, 4.61, and 4.7.
Thanks in advance,
--Ralph
Dr. Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own.
Ralph.Sobek at irit dot fr Addresses are ordered by importance.
sobek at irit.fr, newsmaster@irit dot fr, postmaster at irit dot fr
Ph:(+33)[0]561558618 FAX:(+33)[0]561556258 http://www.irit.fr/~Ralph.Sobek/
===============================================================================
Why can't Congress pass Gun Control or decent Health HMO Laws? And East Timor?
From: "M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne at gamewood dot net>
Subject: Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes.
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:11:06 -0500
Use formail to fix the file...
example:
formail -b < oldfile > newfile
then replace oldfile with newfile
That should fix the corrupted message whereever it is.
Save a copy of oldfile incase you need to experiment with the parameters for
formail. Backups are always a good idea.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie at forrie dot com>
To: Subscribers of Qpopper <qpopper at lists.pensive dot org>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 1:10 PM
Subject: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition
modes.
> It would be somewhat useful if there were some debugging output that might
point or hint to where it hits this problem in the mail file. I have a user
now with 600+ messages, and I'm NOT about to go through each one of them to
figure it out.
>
>
> _F
>
>
From: "Network Admin [JPeterson]" <jay at qtm dot net>
Subject: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:57:51 -0500
On most messages I get, if I view full headers I see something like the
following:
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [204.210.11.246])
by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10253
for <jay at qtm dot net>; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:31:32 -0500 (EST)
But not always, a lot of time when there is SPAM I won't see the for
<jay at qtm dot net> orwhatever.. it looks more like the following:
Received: from mail.orig.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1])
by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA25177;
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:56:24 -0500 (EST)
or is this more likely something that I need to take up with sendmail?
it just seemed that when I used cucipop I always saw this info ..
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:11:52 -0800
From: Leonard Hermens <Leonard.Hermens at rcity dot com>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
At 2:57 PM -0500 12/16/99, Network Admin [JPeterson wrote:
>
>
>or is this more likely something that I need to take up with sendmail?
>it just seemed that when I used cucipop I always saw this info ..
You are correct that sendmail inserts the header information.
-- Leonard
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:18:04 -0600 (CST)
From: James Sneeringer <jvs at ocslink dot com>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Network Admin [JPeterson] wrote:
| Received: from mail.orig.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1])
| by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA25177;
| Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:56:24 -0500 (EST)
Sendmail does not print the recipient if more than one RCPT was specified
for the message during the SMTP transaction, or if it went to an alias
with multiple recipients. It has nothing to do with Qpopper or cucipop.
-James
From: "Nick Sancho" <nick at sonicair dot com>
Subject: Request regarding procmail/formail
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:58:57 -0700
I am trying to set up an auto reply for a certain user on my mail server,
and I have procmail and formail compiled but I have never used it before,
and was wondering if someone could give me a howto.
From: "M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne at gamewood dot net>
Subject: Re: Request regarding procmail/formail
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 16:15:18 -0500
Nick,
I'd recommend that you check out the various faq's and links at:
http://www.procmail.org/
I did a search on the "searchable mail archives" for "auto responder" and
had lots of hits.
You should be able to find something in there for automatic replies.
And there are a multitude of examples for you to try out with procmail.
Didn't a man page come with your procmail and formail?
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Sancho <nick at sonicair dot com>
To: Subscribers of Qpopper <qpopper at lists.pensive dot org>
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 3:58 PM
Subject: Request regarding procmail/formail
> I am trying to set up an auto reply for a certain user on my mail server,
> and I have procmail and formail compiled but I have never used it before,
> and was wondering if someone could give me a howto.
>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:20:24 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Network Admin [JPeterson] wrote:
> On most messages I get, if I view full headers I see something like the
> following:
>
> Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [204.210.11.246])
> by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10253
> for <jay at qtm dot net>; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:31:32 -0500 (EST)
This only happens if there is a single recipient.
> But not always, a lot of time when there is SPAM I won't see the for
> <jay at qtm dot net> orwhatever.. it looks more like the following:
>
> Received: from mail.orig.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1])
> by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA25177;
> Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:56:24 -0500 (EST)
This is standard for any mail with multiple local RCPT TO:<>'s.
> or is this more likely something that I need to take up with sendmail?
It's a sendmail issue.
AB
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marcus_Vinícius_Eiras_Zamignani?= <marcus at triarquia.com dot br>
Subject: recipient rejected
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:41:20 -0200
I just installed qpopper in my Red Hat Linux but I'm having problems:
When someone sends an email to one of the server (Linux) users, it doesn't
arrive and the email is sent back with this message:
--------------
You sent a message which could not be delivered.
The error message is:
Remote SMTP Server rejected recipient (to:) user
--------------
The command
# telnet localhost smtp
is all right.
And I can also get mail via a POP client (Netscape Messenger), when another
user sends a mail from the same server.
What could be causing this?
Marcus
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 11:21:56 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Subject: Re: Request regarding procmail/formail
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, M. Edward Wilborne III wrote:
> Nick,
>
> I'd recommend that you check out the various faq's and links at:
>
> http://www.procmail.org/
>
> I did a search on the "searchable mail archives" for "auto responder" and
> had lots of hits.
Or just man vacation. :-)
AB
From: Nick Christenson <npc at sendmail dot com>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:44:21 -0800 (PST)
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Network Admin [JPeterson] wrote:
>
> > On most messages I get, if I view full headers I see something like the
> > following:
> >
> > Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [204.210.11.246])
> > by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10253
> > for <jay at qtm dot net>; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:31:32 -0500 (EST)
>
> This only happens if there is a single recipient.
>
> > But not always, a lot of time when there is SPAM I won't see the for
> > <jay at qtm dot net> orwhatever.. it looks more like the following:
> >
> > Received: from mail.orig.iprolink.ch (rsge1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1])
> > by garcon.qtm.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA25177;
> > Thu, 16 Dec 1999 03:56:24 -0500 (EST)
>
> This is standard for any mail with multiple local RCPT TO:<>'s.
The description above is quite correct.
> > or is this more likely something that I need to take up with sendmail?
>
> It's a sendmail issue.
It absolutely is. As a further note, it's a feature and it's unlikely
that this behavior would be changed. The reason for this is that if
the recipients were listed on the Received lines when there are multiple
recipients, then BCC lines would be useless, the hidden recipients
would be exposed in the header.
Think about it this way: The default condition is that this information
is not available. When sendmail detects that the message is going to
a single recipient so there's no possibility of privacy loss, it adds
an additional bit of information that it couldn't normally.
It is widely felt that this is the Right Thing to do, and I wouldn't
expect this behavior to be changed in the foreseeable future. Doing
so would make the mailing list people and privacy advocates irate.
Hope this helps.
--
Nick Christenson
npc at sendmail dot com
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:13:49 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Alan Brown <alan at manawatu.gen dot nz>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Nick Christenson wrote:
> > > or is this more likely something that I need to take up with sendmail?
> >
> > It's a sendmail issue.
>
> It absolutely is. As a further note, it's a feature and it's unlikely
> that this behavior would be changed.
It can be changed without compromising privacy.
> The reason for this is that if
> the recipients were listed on the Received lines when there are multiple
> recipients, then BCC lines would be useless, the hidden recipients
> would be exposed in the header.
If sendmail inserts a X-Recipient header for each message as it hands it
to mail.local then the recipient can be shown without exposing Bcc
lists.
AB
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:13:30 -0800
From: Qpopper Support <qpopper at qualcomm dot com>
Subject: Re: -ERR Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change
At 01:10 PM 12/16/99 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>It would be somewhat useful if there were some debugging output that might
>point or hint to where it hits this problem in the mail file. I have a
>user now with 600+ messages, and I'm NOT about to go through each one of
>them to figure it out.
The problem is with the first non-blank line in the spool file.
See the FAQ for more information:
<http://www.eudora.com/qpopper/qpop_faq.html#from.lines>
From: "Dan Harkless" <dan-qpopper at dilvish.speed dot net>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:07:08 -0800
Nick Christenson <npc at sendmail dot com> writes:
> It absolutely is. As a further note, it's a feature and it's unlikely
> that this behavior would be changed. The reason for this is that if
> the recipients were listed on the Received lines when there are multiple
> recipients, then BCC lines would be useless, the hidden recipients
> would be exposed in the header.
>
> Think about it this way: The default condition is that this information
> is not available. When sendmail detects that the message is going to
> a single recipient so there's no possibility of privacy loss, it adds
> an additional bit of information that it couldn't normally.
>
> It is widely felt that this is the Right Thing to do, and I wouldn't
> expect this behavior to be changed in the foreseeable future. Doing
> so would make the mailing list people and privacy advocates irate.
I know there'd be technical issues to work out, but I wish sendmail could
be configured to write a different Received: line for each mail drop the
message is put in, with only that recipient's address.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
dan-qpopper at dilvish.speed dot net | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:21:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed at wcug.wwu dot edu>
Subject: Re: recipient rejected
Marcus:
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, [iso-8859-1] Marcus Vinícius Eiras Zamignani wrote:
> When someone sends an email to one of the server (Linux) users, it doesn'=
t
> arrive and the email is sent back with this message:
> Remote SMTP Server rejected recipient (to:) user
This is not a qpopper situation; maybe you should do some searches on some
mailing list archives for your smtp server.
> And I can also get mail via a POP client (Netscape Messenger), when anoth=
er
> user sends a mail from the same server.
This sounds like your qpopper is working correctly.
Jeremy C. Reed
http://www.reedmedia.net
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:22:37 -0800
From: Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm dot com>
Subject: Re: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
At 02:44 PM 12/16/99 -0800, Nick Christenson wrote:
>Think about it this way: The default condition is that this information
>is not available. When sendmail detects that the message is going to
>a single recipient so there's no possibility of privacy loss, it adds
>an additional bit of information that it couldn't normally.
>
>It is widely felt that this is the Right Thing to do, and I wouldn't
>expect this behavior to be changed in the foreseeable future. Doing
>so would make the mailing list people and privacy advocates irate.
I agree, but one could also make the point that adding the information when
there is only one recipient, and not adding it when there are multiple
recipients also discloses information that should remain private. If you
get an email from someone, and you are the only recipient in the address
headers, yet the Received header doesn't contain the "for" clause (and your
MTA normally inserts them), then you can infer that the message was BCCed
to someone. You probably aren't supposed to know that.
From: "Network Admin [JPeterson]" <jay at qtm dot net>
Subject: RE: Received: by (for mbox:jay)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:05:10 -0500
>
>
> At 02:44 PM 12/16/99 -0800, Nick Christenson wrote:
>
[snip]
> (and your
> MTA normally inserts them), then you can infer that the message was BCCed
> to someone. You probably aren't supposed to know that.
Well the point I was trying to make is that I would like to (and feel
entitled to know) why it ended up in /var/mail/jay =) [eg- was it sent to
billing, noc, info, sales, etc.etc..) simply for reasons of .. well 1:
filtering and 2: SPAM reporting..
`nuff said I'm hacking it out with the sendmail people - thanks tho! =)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:48:05 +1100
From: Shane Clayworth <sclay at turboweb.net dot au>
Subject: new user - dele command
Hello,
Is it possible via telnet to delete multiple messages through a single
command?
ie. dele 1-6
Regards
Shane
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:10:30 -0800
From: Randall Gellens <randy at pensive dot org>
Subject: Re: new user - dele command
At 3:48 AM +1100 12/18/99, Shane Clayworth wrote:
> Hello,
> Is it possible via telnet to delete multiple messages through a single
> command?
> ie. dele 1-6
No. The POP protocol only allows DELE to mark as deleted one message.
--
Randall Gellens Randy at Pensive dot Org
---------------------- (randomly-selected tag) ---------------------
Vous etes ici
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:46:22 -0800
From: Qpopper Support <qpopper at qualcomm dot com>
Subject: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
Qpopper 3.0b26 is available at
<ftp://ftp.qualcomm.com/eudora/servers/unix/popper/>.
Changes from 3.0b25 to 3.0b26
-----------------------------
1. Delete unused --enable-mangle ./configure flag.
2. Added --with-warnings for extra compiler warnings.
3. Added check if ar chokes on -r.
4. Added --with-warnings for extra compiler warnings.
5. If gcc version 2.7.2.3 is detected, remove -O2 flag.
6. Fixes for compilers/OS's where char is unsigned by default.
7. Eliminate compiler warning about 'const char *'.
8. Ensure indented preprocessor directives indent after the '#'.
9. Added -lsec to $LIBS when --enable-specialauth is used on HP.
10. Ensured FILENAME_MAX defined.
11. Made sure all functions in pop_xmit.c return a value.
From: "Kenneth Porter" <shiva at well dot com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 20:57:06 -0800
Subject: Re: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 18:46:22 -0800, Qpopper Support wrote:
>Changes from 3.0b25 to 3.0b26
Excellent news! Looks like this addresses several outstanding concerns.
It now compiles clean on my Red Hat 5.2 box with the extra warnings
enabled.
I'd suggest fixing the Last updated date at the top of the
Release.Notes.
Ken
mailto:shiva at well dot com
http://www.sewingwitch.com/ken/
http://www.215Now.com/
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 01:55:56 -0500
From: Tomasz Orzechowski <tmo at apk dot net>
Subject: Re: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
Qpopper Support wrote on Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 06:46:22PM -0800:i
> 2. Added --with-warnings for extra compiler warnings.
> 4. Added --with-warnings for extra compiler warnings.
:-)
--
Tomasz Orzechowski tmo at apk dot net
Director, Department of Redundancy Department tmo at apk dot net
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:20:44 +0100 (MET)
From: Carrer Yuri <yurj at dns.alfa dot it>
Subject: Re: Qpopper 3.0b26 available
> 5. If gcc version 2.7.2.3 is detected, remove -O2 flag.
Why? :)